May
5
Fri
2023
09 Maternal knowledge of fetal movement among third-trimester pregnant women at JMC, Ethiopia
May 5 @ 06:00 – 06:50
09  Maternal knowledge of fetal movement among third-trimester pregnant women at JMC, Ethiopia @ Room B

Speaker: Tsegaw Biyazin

Facilitator: Caroline Maringa and Meron Tessema Bekele

Antenatal fetal surveillance is a method of monitoring fetal welling during intrauterine life. Fetal movement counting is one parameter of antenatal fetal surveillance and it has a vital role to reduce stillbirth and prenatal mortality. This study aimed to assess maternal knowledge of fetal movement among pregnant women in Jimma Medical center, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Method: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Jimma Medical center from June 1 to July 30, 2022. A structured and pretest questionnaire was used to collect data. A systematic sampling technique was applied to collect data through a face-to-face interview. Binary and multivariate logistic regression was carryout to identify candidate predictors and significant variables respectively.

Result: A total of 422 respondents involved in the study. The majority of respondents 189(46.7%) were in the age group of 25-31 years. Regarding marital status, more than three-fourths of 323(79.8%) participants were engaged. Only one hundred twenty-two (30.1%) of respondents had good knowledge regards to their fetal movement count. predictors includes residence [AOR=.29, 95% CI (.16-.56), P value;.000], gestational age [AOR=.42, 95% CI (.24-.76);P-value;.004], high-risk pregnancy [AOR=5.34, 95% CI (2.46-11.60); P-value;.000] and health care provider [AOR=2.61,95% CI (1.49-4.56); P-value;.001) were among significant variables with knowledge of fetal movement counting.

Conclusion: the overall maternal knowledge regards fetal movement is unsatisfactory. Respondents’ residence, gestational age, pregnancy status, and source of information were significant predictors of maternal knowledge. Health care providers.

 

Recording: https://youtu.be/1P-fOkA9tPg

23 Obstetric outcomes and costs in obese and normal-weight pregnant women / Resultados y costes obstétricos en gestantes obesas y con normopeso (Spanish)
May 5 @ 20:00 – 20:50
23 Obstetric outcomes and costs in obese and normal-weight pregnant women / Resultados y costes obstétricos en gestantes obesas y con normopeso  (Spanish) @ Room B

Speaker: Patricia Marianella 

Facilitator: Paloma Terra

El objetivo fue comparar los resultados materno-neonatales y costos de la resolución de embarazos, en mujeres obesas y con peso normal pregestacional.

Métodos: Estudio transversal realizado en 60 gestantes con obesidad y 120 con peso normal pregestacional atendidas en un hospital público de Lima durante el 2018, seleccionadas aleatoriamente. Se recolectaron datos sociodemográficos, indicadores maternos (índice de masa corporal pregestacional, controles prenatales, edad gestacional, días de hospitalización), neonatales (Apgar, peso, morbilidad, edad gestacional por examen físico, días de hospitalización) y datos de los costos (medicamentos, procedimientos e insumos). Se utilizó la prueba estadística U de Mann Whitney.

Resultados: Se encontraron diferencias entre mujeres obesas y con peso normal pregestacional en los días de hospitalización materna (3 ±1,2 días vs 2,0 ±1,2 días; p=0,000); en el peso del recién nacido (3 615 ± 518,03 gr vs 3 245 ± 426,25 gr; p=0,000), en el costo de medicamentos ($ 19,78 ±16,47 vs $ 3,21 ±15,57; p=0,000), en el costo de procedimientos ($ 40,65 ±46,78 vs $ 27,67 ±49,47; p=0,001), y en el costo de insumos ($ 54,08 ±29,02 vs $ 9,32 ±28,26; p=0,000).

Conclusión: Las mujeres obesas presentaron recién nacidos con mayor peso, contaron con más días de hospitalización y los costos de medicamentos, procedimientos e insumos fueron superiores en comparación con las mujeres de peso normal.

English: 

The objective was to compare maternal-neonatal outcomes and costs of pregnancy resolution in obese women and women with normal pregestational weight. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in 60 pregnant women, randomly selected, with obesity and 120 with normal pregestational weight attended in a public hospital in Lima during 2018. Sociodemographic data, maternal indicators (pregestational body mass index, prenatal controls, gestational age, days of hospitalization), neonatal (Apgar, weight, morbidity, gestational age by physical examination, days of hospitalization) and cost data (drugs, procedures and supplies) were collected. The Mann Whitney U statistical test was used. Results: Differences were found between obese and pregestational normal weight women in maternal hospitalization days (3 ±1.2 days vs. 2.0 ±1.2 days; p=0.000); in newborn weight (3 615 ± 518.03 gr vs. 3 245 ± 426.25 gr; p=0.000), in the cost of medications ($ 19.78 ±16.47 vs $ 3.21 ±15.57; p=0.000), in the cost of procedures ($ 40.65 ±46.78 vs $ 27.67 ±49.47; p=0.001), and in the cost of supplies ($ 54.08 ±29.02 vs $ 9.32 ±28.26; p=0.000).Conclusion: Obese women had heavier newborns, more days of hospitalization and the costs of medications, procedures and supplies were higher compared to women of normal weight.

Recording: https://youtu.be/McAV7M1Ub4M

24 KEYNOTE :: Céline Lemay
May 5 @ 21:00 – 21:50
24 KEYNOTE ::  Céline Lemay @ Room D

Title: Considering evidence and wisdom in professional reality

Speaker: Céline Lemay

Facilitator: Elisa Segoni

With EBM we also see a proliferation of guidelines and recommendations directed targeting practitioners that are expected to “apply” them and valuing a standardised care. In their daily practice midwives are facing two different important professional orientations: following guidelines/protocols and also providing a woman centered individualized care. How to take the most appropriate decision for the patient then? The reality is complex and often hold ethical tensions. How can we demonstrate a good quality of care? In past years there was a number of publications promoting the importance of more practical wisdom or “phronesis” in health care professional practice. A review of literature on the subject was undertook and 37 papers were selected to answer the main question: how can we understand the meaning of practical wisdom and its place for a good quality of healthcare? Can practical wisdom be learned, taught, developed and cultivated? We will develop the mean findings of our review, highlighting the fundamental place of professional judgement in the profession. It is a question of using discernment and deliberation to decide the best action for the good of a unique person in a context of care.  There is also the valorisation of a reflexive practice in clinical places as well as using narratives of experiences to learn discussion and reflection during undergraduate period. In all context of care practical wisdom can help midwives to use the strengths of EBM AND have a woman centered care. It is seen as a mean to flourish as a professional.

Recording: https://youtu.be/Ir1AJXKZVQs

May
5
Sun
2024
05 ‘Learning, Unlearning and Relearning: A Practice Shift’ Narrative Inquiry of core midwives’ experiences attending home births in New Zealand
May 5 @ 02:00 – 02:50
05 'Learning, Unlearning and Relearning: A Practice Shift' Narrative Inquiry of core midwives' experiences attending home births in New Zealand @ ZOOM

Speaker: Erin Hanlon

Facilitator: Cecilia Jevitt and Akusmayra Ambarwati(Shadow)

Abstract:

Since 1990, New Zealand midwives have been privileged to elect to work within tertiary or primary health settings, employed, self-employed (case-loading), or a hybrid variation of both. However, despite the availability of midwife-led care, the local home birth rate has not substantially increased nor have medical interventions decreased, despite having a continuity of care. Narrative Inquiry methodology and methods were used to investigate the changes in the birthing culture in New Zealand from 1990 to today. The elements of temporality (time), sociality (social context), and place were borrowed from Connelly and Clandinin (2006) to collect and analyze stories from midwives and consumer participants nationally. This presentation initially maps the history of midwives gaining autonomy in New Zealand, then explores the experiences of midwives who spoke about a transition in their clinical practice from working within a highly medicalised model across the spectrum to attend home births. These hospital-trained midwives’ shared their stories of how performing highly technological services in labour instilled fears around birth. Participants discussed that in order to become home birth midwives, they needed to unlearn and then relearn the skills required to attend women birthing at home. Using temporality and sociality contextualized their accounts, as participants shared their experiences of how they discovered what birth ‘could be’ with less interference, which separated them apart from the dominant medicalised culture surrounding birth. As they relayed their stories around their relearning, they expressed a collegiality with other practitioners, and supportive, trusted relationships with women.

Recording: https://youtu.be/cG21rLXEzmo