Speaker: Fatimah Azzahra
Facilitator: Isabella Garti
Introduction: The success of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) is associated with the increasing global prevalence of cesarean sections. VBAC presents a feasible alternative for numerous women, reducing the necessity for repeat cesarean sections and the related risks.
Objective: Our review identifies essential medical, psychological, and institutional factors that affect VBAC outcomes.
Methods: This study examined 21 peer-reviewed articles sourced from PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The examined factors included maternal age, prior vaginal birth experience, cervical dilation, access to healthcare, and psychosocial support.
Results: A successful VBAC is often associated with younger maternal age, a prior history of vaginal birth, spontaneous onset of labor, and adequate cervical dilation at the time of admission. Psychosocial support, encompassing familial encouragement and guidance from healthcare professionals, significantly influenced decisions regarding VBAC. Hospital policies supporting VBAC and improving access to emergency services have increased success rates.
Conclusion: The success of VBAC is determined by multiple medical, social, and institutional factors. Our review underscores the necessity for standardized practices that facilitate VBAC and enhanced counseling to empower women’s decisions regarding childbirth. Future research should investigate large, diverse, multicenter cohorts to validate the predictors of VBAC success and assess long-term outcomes compared to repeat cesarean sections.
Key message: Empowering natural birth after a cesarean requires a multifaceted approach, with a particular focus on medical factors. Equally important are continuous care and fostering a positive mindset, which is essential to achieving a successful natural birth and is supported by midwives, obstetricians, and all birth workers.
Speaker: Yvonne Meyer
Facilitator: Celine Lemay
Sages-femmes dans certaines publications. C’est le cas pour l’inscription de notre activité professionnelle au patrimoine immatériel UNESCO où, dans l’annonce en français, le mot sage-femme est absent du titre. Comment sont présentées les sages-femmes ailleurs ? Neuf documents ont été repérés qui ont pour titre l’art, les soins, la pratique, les sciences ou la profession de sage-femme. Les résumés de ces documents seront présentés, ainsi que l’analyse réalisée, basée sur les critères de soins centrés sur le patient (Rycroft-Maloine, 2004). Les résultats montrent que toutes ces formulations sont polysémiques et qu’elles n’ont pas exactement la même portée. Par contre, toutes présentent haut et fort les sages-femmes et ce qui les caractérise. Si UNESCO avait titré « Les soins de sage-femme : connaissances, savoir-faire et pratiques », les sages-femmes seraient visibles partout dans le monde francophone.
The theme of the intervention is motivated by a regrettable problem of visibility of midwives in certain publications. This is the case for the inclusion of our professional activity in UNESCO’s intangible heritage list, where, in the French announcement, the word sage-femme is absent from the title. How are midwives presented elsewhere? Nine documents have been identified that deal with the art, care, practice, science or profession of midwifery. Summaries of these documents will be presented, along with the analysis carried out, based on the criteria of patient-centred care (Rycroft-Maloine, 2004). The results show that all these formulations are polysemous and do not have exactly the same scope. However, they all make a strong case for midwives and what characterises them. If UNESCO had published the title « Les soins de sage-femme: connaissances, savoir-faire et pratiques » (‘Midwifery: knowledge, skills and practices’), midwives would be visible throughout the French-speaking world.
Check time in your location https://bit.ly/VIDM25-closing-session
